Accidental Gods meanders at times, delineating some connections that are less plausible than others
Accidental Gods: On Men Unwittingly Turned Divine
Author: Anna Della Subin
Publisher: Metropolitan Books
You might think that being worshipped as a god would be the ultimate dream come true — all that power and pageantry and extravagant adoration. But as I learned from Anna Della Subin’s Accidental Gods,what’s even more striking than the surprising frequency with which mortal men have been “unwittingly turned divine” is how often they tried to disavow their newfound exaltation.
“I am not God” was a sentence that Gandhi found himself saying again and again. During Jawaharlal Nehru’s political ascent in the 1930s, the man who would become India’s first prime minister moved to write an essay, under a pseudonym, warning against his own deification. The Ethiopian emperor Haile Selassie, born Ras Tafari, told Rastafarians during his 1966 visit to Jamaica, “Do not worship me: I am not God” — which only fuelled reverence among those who took his denials as evidence of his mystery. “I would be much quicker to question His Divinity if he stated, ‘Yes, I am God,’” a contributor to an online Rastafari forum wrote about Selassie’s demurral. “Nah, God wouldn’t say that.”
There are much older examples, too. It became a method for legitimating political power as well as constraining it, delineating what a god was (magnanimous, merciful) and therefore what a new god should be. The senate deified Julius Caesar by official decree. By 79 A D, the routine apotheosis of Roman emperors meant that Vespasian, lying on his deathbed, could say, “Oh dear, I think I’m becoming a god.”
Ms Subin, who studied at Harvard Divinity School, clearly delights in such curious details. But this roving and ambitious book is focused on the making of modern gods instead of ancient ones — on the way that Western thought in the modern age was supposed to reflect a progressive disenchantment, a rejection of irrational impulses, but was nevertheless “built upon two altars, of Greco-Roman classicism and Christian creed,” Ms Subin writes, “both of which had men-becoming-gods at their centers.” Belief, in other words, was at the core of modernity, even if that belief was (hypocritically) denied.
Accidental Gods doesn’t follow a strict chronological order, but its overall sweep moves backward in time, starting with 20th-century deifications in a decolonising world and ending several hundred years before, with divinisations of European explorers in the New World. In between are chapters on the British Raj, including a fascinating explanation of how Britain’s imperial reach — with its bureaucracy and data collection — allowed the study of comparative religion to flourish, giving rise to European scholars who proclaimed their expertise on the belief systems of various colonies even without ever stepping foot in any of them.
Ms Subin shows how these scholars’ theories of religion owed quite a lot to their own preoccupations, like a fixation on the notion of “pure” religion and belief, and the assumption that Christianity was the one “rational” faith. This concept of religion — “as a private mystical germ, stripped away from any political or economic context” — meant that the Europeans viewed the locals’ willingness to see the divine in any manner of people and things as proof of an inherent backwardness. If there is a pattern that emerges in this book, it has to do with divinisation’s double-edge. On the one hand, Ms Subin says, deification has been used to subjugate. It was used by the Europeans as evidence that Indigenous people were so childlike that they could mistake white explorers for gods. She reminds us that reports of these deifications were often delivered by the explorers themselves, who recalled being asked if they had descended from the heavens — even though this recollection could have itself constituted a minor miracle, given that the explorers often didn’t speak a word of the Indigenous language.
But Ms Subin also draws attention to deification’s emancipatory potential. The Nikalsainis — Indians who worshipped the notoriously violent 19th-century British brigadier John Nicholson — were, she argues, appropriating his terrible power: “By partaking in His divinity, they were no longer simply creatures, but creators of fear.” Another example she gives is Selassie, a cruel dictator who luxuriated as his people starved; meanwhile, halfway around the world in Jamaica, a prime minister won an election by invoking Rastafarian tropes, and he proceeded to enact social reforms.
Accidental Gods meanders at times, delineating some connections that are less plausible than others; but then the book is less a straightforward historical study than an irreverent bible in its own right, a sort of celestial thought experiment. A chapter on the decades-long worship of Prince Philip (yes, that Prince Philip) on the South Pacific archipelago of Vanuatu acknowledges the apparent paradox of deifying a royal figurehead who was prone to gaffes. Yet the people of Vanuatu, having experienced repeated upheavals and colonisations, might have glimpsed in that very paradox an expanded sense of possibility. As Ms Subin surmises of another man-god elsewhere in the book: “One paradox could only be surmounted by another.”
Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.
We, however, have a request.
As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.
Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.